TPO 6

阅读解析与听力预测

总论：

网络百科不如纸质百科。communal online百科<traditional 听力肯定是说网络和纸质一样好，甚至更好。接下来肯定是提供三个理由论述为什么网络不如纸质，典型的观点理由型文章。

理由1：

网络百科不如纸质百科可靠，撰写人缺乏水准。contributor × academic credential → ×accurate 说网络的撰写人水平一样好，甚至更好；或者说，网络和纸质一样准确，甚至更准确；或者说，就算网络不准确，网络也和纸质一样好，甚至更好（这个有点不现实）。

理由2：

网络容易受到攻击。fabricate, delete, corrupt information 要么说网络并不比纸质更容易受到攻击；要么说，就算受到攻击，网络也不比纸质差。

理由3：

网络太关注大众流行的不重要的问题，而纸质能够挑选真正重要的问题。focus on trivial and popular topics 要么说网络和纸质一样能关注重要问题，甚至更好；要么说，就算网络更关注流行问题，网络也不比纸质差，甚至更好。

听力解析

The criticism…result of prejudice… ignorance about how far online…have come说明听力要捍卫COE(communal online ency-clopedia)，这是废话。无需笔记

First，准备听错误。Traditional…never…perfectly…看来反驳策略是传统百科一样有缺陷。if you are looking for… without any mistakes… not going to find it，这是废话。easy…to be corrected…online…第二个策略，网上的错误好修正，那肯定是说纸质错误不好修正。But…printed…errors remain for decades，是废话。traditional × , easy to correct online, print -remain decades

♦ 本段逻辑梳理：首先，纸质百科一样有错误；而且，网上缺陷好改，纸质的错误一旦犯了几十年不变。

Second，准备听黑客。One strategy…is to put the crucial facts…that nobody disputes in a read-only format… no one can make changes to，解决方案是只读化。Another strategy…is …editors…monitor all changes…and eliminate…malicious，雇用编辑监控。strategy： crucial -read-only format; editors, monitor change, eliminate malicious

♦ 本段逻辑梳理：面对黑客，网络百科第一会将大家都接受的核心信息只读化；第二，雇用编辑来监控一切改动，把有害改动删除。

Third，准备听内容大众化。what's worth knowing about不知道要说什么。The problem for traditional…is that they have limited space，so they have to decide what's important and what's not，这一下子说清楚了策略，很显然，可能会说网络百科不需要决定重要不重要，因为网络没有空间问题。in practice，the judgments…do not reflect…range of interests，而且纸质百科所决定的重要问题并不能体现人们的需要。space…not an issue for online…是废话。The academic articles are still represented in online…过去重要的问题在网上也能呈现。but…greater variety of…topics…reflect the greater diversity of user interest，基本也是废话。strongest advantages，这恰恰是网络的优势。traditional, limited space, has to decide importance,judgments don't reflect range; space, not an issue for online, academic still represen-ted, great variety of topics, advantages

♦ 本段逻辑梳理：传统百科之所以需要选择重要内容，因为传统百科有空间限制，更何况它们所选的所谓的重要内容并不见得反映大众真实的多种需求；相反，网络百科没有空间限制，不需要挑选所谓的重要内容，网络百科能把那些学术内容包含在内，还能更好地表现多种多样的大众实际需求，这恰恰是网络的好处。

满分范文

The article presents three arguments why communal online encyclopedias (COEs) are less valuable than traditional，printed encyclopedias，all of which are dismissed by the lecturer.典型的“观点+三个理由”的文章开头。

For starters, even though the lecturer admits that COEs are fallible, she insists that traditional ones are just as prone to errors. What's worse, while the errors on COEs are easy to detect and correct, those on printed pages often remain for decades before they are corrected.

As forhacking，the lecturerargues thatCOEs have adopted severalstrategies toaddress this problem.相当于否认了网络黑客会对COE产生不良影响，因为网络能处理黑客问题。 First，COEs usearead-only formatfor allthose crucialmaterials already accepted by everybody.Second，editors arehired tomonitorand recognizeall changes madetotheonlinematerials，andareready todeleteallthe malicious ones.

Third，contrary to the article，the lecturer considers the diversity of topics on COEs their main strength rather than weakness.Unlikethearticle，the lecturer considers XXX strength rather than weakness，暗示阅读认为XXX是缺陷，而听力认为是优势。 The reason why traditional encyclopedias have to decide what is important is that they have limited space;consequently，their judgments often fail to represent a diverse range of interest.On the contrary，space is not an issue online，so while academic interest is still represented，there is a greater variety of topics that suit a much more diverse audience.

上一章目录下一章